the Victorian Govt and Bureacrats versus the People.

Let all legal cases against Govt. "no jab. not job" mandates be beware!

25/3/22 : VICTORIAN GOVT NOW DEMANDS THE COMPLAINANTS of THE "NO JAB, NO JOB" MANDATES PAY FOR THEIR COSTS, AFTER DELIBERATELY DELAYING THE COURT CASE INDEFINITELY.

This forces those who have lost their jobs, to pay the Govt Judicial system (judges and QC's) costs.

There is suspected collusion between the complainants lawyers (already paid $100K from crowd funding) and the Govt., in dropping the case.

And making the 20 'without jobs' Complainants (my son one of them) to pay up, perhaps even for our own lawyers extra costs from the Govt delays, unless they get the jab.

See here

Case Study : A Class Action in Supreme Court of Victoria

Background

Victoria is the most draconian of States in the world in regard to it's attempts to stop the spread of COVID. It's 'RULES' can be changed at anytime, and since Dec., 2021, now at the sole discretion of it's Premier (a Marxist with secret deals with the Chinese Communist Party).

Now "Rules" are not the "Law", which follow normal parliamentary procedures and examination. Victorian Courts can impose fines and/or imprisonment prescribed by Law, but it appears not those Rules. And since Rules seem to change every 5 mins, imagine the confusion in the Judiciary!

Statistics vs. Opinions

Being a statistician, I believe statistics are stronger than opinions, especially if from official, verifiable sources in legal arguments.

As COVID events are similar around the world, and Australia were not prepared to provide detailed data info, I found some very interesting data from medical doctors and nurses in the Public Health England (PHE).

Their June 2021 Report indicated that the vaxxed were nearly 9 times more likely to die from COVID than the unvaxxed, due to vaccines reducing personal immunities by 5%w. Deaths from vaccines alone were in the hundreds of thousands.

The UK was quick to cover-up by creating the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) manned by bureaucrats and pollies to ensure the truth from doctors and nurses never got out again!

Victoria Govt now refuses to release COVID Data

At first, the Vic Govt seemed to overstate the deaths (800+ in 2 months in 2021, comprising 97.3% of COVID deaths in Australia at that time. Many suspected incentivisation's for over-stated Reports, as was occurring elsewhere in the world (the same NWO plan of course).

Most perceived this as 'fear-mongering' by Vic Govt to put us into lock-downs, self-imprisonment (the longest in the world). Now, as the reverse seems to be happening.

Despite the Victorian Supreme Court ordering the Govt to release medical data and reports by 5th Nov., 2021, the Vic Govt has refused.

Personal Interest

Because of the 'no jab, no job' mandate, my son joined the Class Action against the Vic Govt. as he has lost his business, let alone a job.

So, I took a close interest in this case, which seemed to be relying on opinions, most emanating from the MSM* media, owned and/or controlled by the NWO, and our Federal and Vic Govt's.

My son's defence team seemed to resigned to the fact that they would never win a case against the Vic Govt in Vic Courts, as proven elsewhere. And were resigned to taking the case to the Federal High Courts of Australia where a different Law is applied - Common Law rights under our 1901 Constitution).

Class Action Supreme Court Case

Since the last Court Case hearing

In early-Jan, 2022 : UK reports 153 000 have died from vaccine injury alone.

Late Jan., 2022, the UK Parliament agreed to abolish all COVID and Vaccine mandates, simply because they did not work, were doing far more damage to their people that COVID itself (no worse than a common cold or flu).

6 Feb, 2022: 12 more European had decided to abandon COVID and Vaccine mandates for the same reasons as the UK.

Now about 25 countries in the world have abandoned mandates, yet we cannot find any mention of this in the Australian MSM or BSM (BigTech Social Media). Why is that?

I think the answer is very obvious, yet unknown to all but the 'Awakened". So, it is up to us "Awakened to encourage the Un-awakened to ask the question WHY?

Learn More

We need to back this up with official, verifiable data, reports and analysis.

If you are interested in verifying and checking our calculations as above, this is coming soon.

Find out more (to come)

Court Decisions

Injunctions

In Victoria, usually the status quo is maintained while the court decides finally what to do. These injunctions are referred to as interlocutory injunctions.

As the first hearing took place before the "No Jab, No Job" mandate came into effect, one would expect the 'status quo' referred to the current situation for the complainants, which was they could continue to work without having to work.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Noticeable collusion

Everyone knows that it is highly unlikely you will win a case in Victorian Courts against the Victorian Government. For example, Cardinal George Pell : Normally a Police docket is made only after a formal complaint is made to and assessed by the Police.

In Pell's case, they opened a docket 18 months before a charge was made, based on a replica of a successful court case in New York 3 months before. Thank Goodness, that there was one experience Criminal Judge in the Vic Appeals Court, the other two were Stock Broker Law and Litigation Law experts. And that the Criminal Judge's dissention held in the High Court appeal.

Law of Precedents

As immigrants, we learnt to our detriment that Australian Law is not prescriptive, i.e. little specific detail is written down (i.e prescribed in writing, stated in black and white). We learnt, from a VCAT court case, that precedence rules, i.e. the prevailing consensus of opinion at the time. This is also largely influenced by those with money and contacts within VCAT. Not unusual as laws world-wide are made by the rich and powerful, for the rich and powerful.

We had presented some 150 VCAT cases (weaker than ours) which VCAT had prior approved. And the Law had changed in 2000, that one could not object any longer against a change in their vista.

Noticeable that the Shires own staff supported our argument, that it was the first time that locals had written in support of our case (usually objections) according to the Shire. The objections came from 'weekenders" who lived in Melbourne, who visited their properties once a month at most. But they were rich and powerful with contacts in VCAT, one even a Barrister in Land matters.

When asked by VCAT to reconcile with these weekenders, I was unable to do so, as a matter of principle, replying with 10 clear points of provable corruption during the whole process!

Delay, delay, delay...

.. to be added - there are a number of very telling reasons why the Vic Govt want this case delayed and delayed.